a.
Find a real world
application OR design your own experimental application relating to rates of
change. (in the blog folder you will find plenty of examples to get you
started)
-
Car losing value over the
years.
b.
Write a narrative or
synopsis explaining your application/experiment and include a question. (For
example, what is the velocity of the snowball at exactly 2 seconds? Or how can
I find the velocity of the baseball at exactly 3 seconds?)
- Cars lose value over time, and the rate of loss
varies according to the car’s age, make and model. For this example I examine
how much a new car depreciate in value over 5 years.
- What is the deprecation value of the car at the third year
or t=3?
c. Create
a table of values for the data that you have recorded from your
application/experiment.
Time (years)
|
Value ($)
|
0
|
31252
|
1
|
23523
|
2
|
20195
|
3
|
16867
|
4
|
14248
|
5
|
11629
|
d.
Graph the points
using the data from your table of values (connect the dots).
e. Calculate
the slope (ARC) of at least three secant lines originating from the same point
on your graph to three different points on your graph (i.e. maybe you want to
know what happens exactly at x = 20, so your points might be (20, 62), (20,
56), (20, 50)). Explain what you notice
about the ARC of these secant lines and what the calculations mean/represent in
terms of your experiment/application.
-
23,523-31,252/1-0= -7,729
- 20,195-23523/2-1= -3,328
- 14,248-16867/4-3= -2619
- So at x=1 the points are (1, -7,729), (1,
-3,328), (1, -2619)
As the car is more used it loses
most of its value on the first year and then it loses less each year.
f. Sketch
an approximation of a tangent line that passes though the same point (P) from
part e to which you connected your secant lines (i.e. you would draw a tangent
line through the point 20, since that is the same point that you used to
calculate your three different secant lines)
Choose a second point (Q) on the tangent line, and
calculate the slope of the line (PQ). This calculation will be the
instantaneous rate of change ((IRC or derivative at a point)…be sure to
identify the units correctly). Explain
what this calculation means mathematically and in terms of your
experiment/application.
- IRC= (-7,729) + (-3,328) + (-2619) /3= -
4,558.7
- - 4,558.7$/year*4 years= $18,234.8
The more the years the car is used the more value it will
lose
h. Explain
in detail how you know that the value from part g is the IRC. (i.e. since the
values of calculations from part d are getting smaller and smaller, this shows
that the slope of the secant is getting closer and closer to the tangent line …
or some explanation similar to this). BE DETAILED!!!
- The
smaller the difference in years the more instantaneous it gets. Since the value
of calculations from the graph in part d are getting smaller and smaller, it
shows that the slope of the secant line is getting closer and closer to the
tangent line.
Your answers are clearly stated and easy to follow. All of the work looks good and neat. You did a good job of finding the IRC of car depreciation.
ReplyDeleteYour calculations are clearly written and easy to follow. I think the topic you chose was interesting as seeing how quickly a car (even after driving it off the dealership) depreciates is both terrifying and unbelievable.
ReplyDeleteI really like your example... it was well written. the amount that a car depreciates is mind boggling.
ReplyDeleteEverything is clear and organized . well done
ReplyDeleteDepreciation was a really cool topic! The organization here is nice as well.
ReplyDeletesara a.,
ReplyDeleteyour topic is a good one! the depreciation of a car is very relevant to everyone.
there were some critical errors in many of your calculations, that i must mention. in the secant line calculation part, your final calculation from 3 to 4 is correct, but the rest of the calculations should have been from 2 to 3 and from 1 to 3. this would have shown secant lines that are getting closer and closer to t = 3. also, in your IRC calculation, it looks like you drew a line through t = 2, when in the beginning, you said you were going to look at t = 3. so, this was a little confusing for me to read. your graphs and tables are clear and organized, though. let me know if you have questions about the mistakes that were made.
professor little