1. Find a real world application
a.
Recorded
data from the population growth of human over a period of time (time vs.
population)
2. Write a narrative or synopsis
explaining your application/experiment and include a question. (for example, what is the velocity of the
snowball at exactly 2 seconds? Or how can I find the velocity of the baseball
at exactly 3 seconds?)
a.
Narrative/Synopsis of application: In this problem, the population is the
dependent variable and time is the independent variable. Thus, the population number is dependent on
time.
b.
Question: What was the rate of change in 1970?
3. Create a table of values for the
data that you have recorded from your application/experiment.
Graph the points using the data
from your table of values (connect the dots).
Calculate the slope (ARC) of at
least three secant lines originating from the same point on your graph
to three different points on your graph (i.e. maybe you want to know what
happens exactly at x = 20, so your points might be (20, 62), (20, 56), (20,
50)). Explain what you notice about the
ARC of these secant lines and what the calculations mean/represent in terms of
your experiment/application.
a.
Change in population / change in time = (e)
i. 4.4-3.6/1980-1970
= 757,876,182/10= 75,787,618.2
ii. 5.3-3.6/1990-1970
= 1,629,644,051/20= 81,482,202.55
iii. 6.1-3.6/2000-1970=
2,436,527,812/30= 81,217,593.73
b.
Notice
about the ARC: The ARC
of the secant lines increases and then decreased a bit with the third
calculation. With the years 1990 and 2000 rate of
change, you can see that the calculations are similar to one another around the
81 millions, thus allowing one to conclude that 81 million is the limit.
c.
Calculations
mean/Represent in term of the experiment: The calculations represent the average
rate of change of the population over the years.
2. Sketch
an approximation of a tangent line that passes though the same point (P) from
part e to which you connected your secant lines (i.e. you would draw a tangent
line through the point 20, since that is the same point that you used to
calculate your three different secant lines)
Choose
a second point (Q) on the tangent line, and calculate the slope of the line
(PQ). This calculation will be the instantaneous rate of change ((IRC
or derivative at a point)…be sure to identify the units correctly). Explain what this calculation means
mathematically and in terms of your experiment/application.
a.
Calculation of Slope of the Line:
i. Change in
Y / Change in X -> 3.6-2.1/1970-1950 -> 1,591,172,616/20 -> 79,558,630
b.
What the calculations
means mathematically in terms of the experiment/application: The calculations are not exactly the same
results that were calculated with the rate of change earlier, but that is okay.
The calculations are somewhat similar and are reasonably close when considering
the fact that the points were estimated and the tangent may not have been drawn
perfectly. Overall, the calculations done earlier, which resulted in our limit
being around 81 million, should be similar to the calculations here as
instantaneous rate of change is the same as finding the slope at a point (limit
of the difference quotient of the derivative). The end results are not exactly
the same, but close enough. From this, we can see that the limit is towards 81
million. We are changing (in our case, increasing) the
population roughly 81 million people a year.
2. Explain
in detail how you know that the value from part g is the IRC. (i.e. since the values of calculations from
part d are getting smaller and smaller, this shows that the slope of the secant
is getting closer and closer to the tangent line … or some explanation similar
to this).
a.
The value from part g is the IRC due to several of
reasons. First, as seen in part d, we noted that
i. 4.4-3.6/1980-1970
= 757,876,182/10= 75,787,618.2
ii. 5.3-3.6/1990-1970
= 1,629,644,051/20= 81,482,202.55
iii. 6.1-3.6/2000-1970=
2,436,527,812/30= 81,217,593.73
From these calculations, we noted that the limit was
close to 81 million because the calculations were not increasing that much in
the 81 millions, thus we can conclude that is the limit.
Now in part g, we noted that the IRC was 79,558,630 we can see that the IRC is
getting closer to the limit of 81,000,000. This shows that secant is getting
closer and closer to the tangent line. We can conclude that our population is
increasing by 81 million people a year.
Also, in the end it doesn’t matter what calculation we did as we can see
that the numbers are coming closer to 81 million. Thus, we can determine that
81 million is our limit, especially since IRC, derivative, and slopes are all synonyms
of one another.
you explained the population growth of humans from1950 to 2010 and that is a long period of time and you indicated that there is a limit fro growth which was 81 million which is very interesting
ReplyDeleteYour blog is well articulated and very organized. Your explanations are clear and easy to understand.
ReplyDeleteOutstanding! i found the information to be well organized, easy to decipher, and the growth rate is very interesting.
ReplyDeleteVrey detailed work and well done . it is very intersting
ReplyDeleteVery thoroughly explained through showing AND telling! Nice work!
ReplyDeletesara p.,
ReplyDeletei agree with taylor. nice showing AND telling! your explanations were spot on! i love how you talked about the results mathematically using great mathematical language. you definitely showed a nice understanding of the IRC and it's meaning in real life!
the only thing that is missing in your calculations are your units in the secant section! :/
great job!
professor little