Blog Post 3
Marley Kraft
Applied Calculus
March 30th
2015
Option C;
Standard Micro
Standard
Micro, a company founded in 2014, is a producer of microprocessors built for
rockets and long-range ballistic missiles. Standard Micro sells primarily to
governments and private space programs such as Space X. The two Killow
Brothers, who had previously worked in the microprocessor division of Boeing
before breaking off to start Standard Micro, founded the company. Standard
Micro is incorporated in Delaware, but holds primary and factory operations in
Alexandria, VA.
Fixed Costs ($);
Property
Plant and Equipment; 350,000
Administrative
Costs; 273,000
Overhead; 100,000
Variable Costs ($);
Raw
Materials Per Unit; 2000
Labor Per
Unit; 1000
Shipping
Per Unit; 50
Cost Function;
C(q) = 723,000 + 3050q
Price per Unit; 9000
R(q) =
9000q
Profit Function;
P(q) = R(q)
– C(q)
P(q) =
9000q – (723,000 + 3050q)
P(q) =
5950q – 723,000
Breakeven Point;
R(q) = C(q)
9000q = 723,000
+ 3050q
9000q -
3050q = 723,000
q = 723,000/5950
q = 121.512605
units to break even
Graph Interpretation;
The
Cost/Rev graph intersects at the break even point and from that point continue
and further separate showing where profit is made. The Cost function slope is a
constant meaning the marginal cost is similarly constant, and it that starts at
the fixed costs of 723,000. The Revenue function starts at the original and
takes off rapidly, with a constant marginal revenue/slope of 9000.
The Profit
Function Graph;
The Profit
function graph begins at the origin point in this graph, though I have made the
origin equal to the breakeven point this is too show that there is no profit
below this quantity.
Marginal Cost;
Daily Units
= 50
C(q) =
723000 + 3050q
C’(q) =
3050
Marginal
Cost is constant, to produce the 50th unit costs 3050
Average Cost
A(q) = C(q)
/ q
A(q) =
723000 + 3050*50 / 50 = 17510
Marginal Revenue =
9000
Marginal
Revenue is higher at q = n because both marginal revenue and marginal cost are
constant.
Daily Units; The number of units sold daily is below the
break even point but that only really matters if you look at it narrowly
focused on a day by day basis. In reality fixed costs are, yearly, which means
the cost function and the break-even point derived from it, are stated on a
yearly basis. In three days time the company will produce/sell nearly 30 more
units total than its break even point(150 – 121
= 29), so in reality the fact that we produce less than our breakeven
point in a day is pointless, by the third day of the year we have surpassed our
breakeven point and producing a net profit.
Increased By One Unit;
Regardless
of the math I can tell you with certainty in the long run the company will
continue to make money.
R(51) =
9000*51
R(51) = 459,000
C(51) =
723,000 + 3050(51) = 878,550
Again in
the short run it appears we’ve lost money and are only continuing to lose
money, but because we only pay our fixed costs once per year, in three days
time we will be making profit.
Increase in Production at q = n;
When
marginal cost is less than Average cost increasing production decreases average
cost, thus because that is the case here, increasing production will decrease average cost.
Decreasing
average cost is always a good thing, the less we pay per unit the easier it is
to produce more units, and thus the cheaper it is to produce those units and so
on and so forth.
Future Analysis;
In the next five years, fixed costs will only amount to approximately
3 million dollars, while revenues will be over 820 million and with variable
costs of around 278 million that’s nearly 539 million dollars in profit. This
is of course all assuming that the business continues to sell and produce 50
units a day, even at average for the year. Large spikes in business or losses
in business could throw a company with such high costs into turmoil, but with a
solid profit margin if the company is able to survive more than a few years it
will have profit to reinvest or hold incase of any damages.
Marley, your sarcasm throughout your blog is hilarious. I also really like the idea you came up with for a company. I think it is interesting. All of your calculations appear to be right, great job!
ReplyDeleteYou delivered your point. Plus, the company you chose was interesting.
ReplyDeleteNice work on the post. However, I do believe that you needed to spent some extra effort to scan your graph papers or building them using word instead of just taking phone pictures. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteAgree with Mike; this is one of the best blogs that I have read in this section. Thanks for letting know about this company. :)
ReplyDeletemarley,
ReplyDeletei like the intro to this post and all of the background that you give about the company. also, really nice job of organizing your costs and formulas in the first portion of the post. your graphs are clear and easy to interpret, but the profit function graph is incorrect. it should start below the x-axis and the break-even point should cross at the x-axis. also, the slopes of the average cost vs marginal cost graphs should both just be straight lines with slopes of 3050 for mc starting at the fixed cost on the y-axis and the average cost slope should start at the origin and have a slope of 17510. i think there were a few places where you forgot units, but other than that, i enjoyed this post.
i like how you give a full analysis of why the company will survive including economic reasons as well as showing the mathematical calculations. also, i like that you are realistic about how your break-even point doesn't really mean much for your business. nice job!
professor little